![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
New Hampshire Trappers Association Rambling Along The Trapline
|
![]() |
A hypothetical fixed
quantity of habitat with a hypothetical fixed quantity of other
components such as nesting sites, cover, food, and water, will produce a
hypothetical quantity of game birds which can be skewed up or down due
to weather extremes. Now whatever this level of production is at Mother
Nature’s game farm the whole effort can be diminished considerably if
the crop is not protected from predators. Wildlife Biologists keep track
of a lot of variables in their efforts to advance science. Science is
after all the product of observation in the realm of cause and effect.
Yet those who have reason to find the truth are sometimes blinded by
other sensibilities, which prevent them from achieving their goal.
Science has proven over time that the predator component is a far more
serious element than acknowledged, but many Sportsmen/Conservation
groups have not embraced this fact. The more expansive the membership,
the more likely there will be a constituency within the group that
thinks predator management is a non issue or that a non lethal method of
control is adequate even if it is not. But the facts are clear, that for
a reasonable effort at predator control via trapping there is a
significant payback in the form of less overall mortality of game birds.
This means more game birds for the sportsmen’s dollars, or higher
production from the limited appropriate habitat. There is at least one
game bird Sportsman’s/Conservation group that seriously advocates this
point of view, and that is Delta Waterfowl. Check out their web site at www.deltawaterfowl.org
or call them at 888-987-3695 to find out more about their predator
management research. Delta has been funding some of the best research
into waterfowl science since it’s inception. Delta is a strong
advocate for trapping because the scientific research backs up their
contention that trapping is cost effective, and gets the desired
results.

Although
the large Sportsmen’s/Conservation groups all occasionally utilize
trapping to protect sensitive habitat situations and severely endangered
bird species, they do not generally embrace it for the cost effective
and efficient tool that it is. If they did, it would be annually
incorporated into their management plans. Regrettably this equates to
wasted Sportsmen’s dollars. Just how much does it cost to raise a game
bird in the wild on appropriate habitat? What is the cost to
contributing sportsmen to maintain a large population of predators on a
diet of chicks and eggs? Can predator management via trapping make a
significant difference in successful game bird production and
significantly reduce the cost per bird to the sportsmen? Don’t take
your answer from the trapper, check with Delta to benefit from their
scientific data and conclusions.
Take some time to
study this topic and perhaps you will question if the organizations you
belong to are adequately utilizing the trapping tool in their game bird
management plan and practice. Perhaps you will see the value for
seasonal trapping to manage predator species in the habitat your club
manages to benefit game bird species. Perhaps you will become a more
vocal advocate for trapping in general.